\t\t\t\t\t\t\t ![](\"http:\/\/www.lekolin.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/03\/394-1.jpg\")
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n
0<\/p>\n
21<\/p>\n
TR<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
\t :” ” <\/p>\n
\t :”” <\/p>\n
\t ” “,” ” <\/p>\n
\t ” ” <\/p>\n
G\u0130R\u0130\u015e<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/span>Bat\u0131\u2019n\u0131n kendi \u00a0<\/span>A\u011f\u0131rl\u0131kl\u0131 olarak Said\u2019in ele\u015ftirisi, b\u00fct\u00fcn bir literat\u00fcr\u00fc \u2018oryantalist\u2019 Oryantalizmin Tan\u0131m\u0131<\/p>\n Oryantalizm Bat\u0131\u2019n\u0131n veya Do\u011fu\u2019nun d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki bilgi \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span>Avrupal\u0131 i\u00e7in \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span>Amerikal\u0131lar i\u00e7in \u201c\u00c7o\u011fu Do\u011fulu insan, Avrupal\u0131lar\u0131 kendine g\u00fcvenen, \u00e7ok ak\u0131ll\u0131 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span>\u015eark\u0131 \u00f6\u011freten, \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span>Do\u011fu, Avrupa\u2019ya \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span>Sorunum ne \u00a0\u00a0 <\/span>Oryantalizmi bir \u201cOrtado\u011fu d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda hi\u00e7bir k\u00fclt\u00fcr alan\u0131nda kapitalist \u00a0<\/span>Oryantalizm, \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span>Oryantalist \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span>Balfour\u2019a g\u00f6re \u00a0<\/span>\u201c \u0130skender\u2019in ya\u015fam\u0131 \u00a0 <\/span>Bat\u0131l\u0131 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span>Oryantalizm \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span>\u00c7a\u011fda\u015f \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span>\u201cG\u00fcn\u00fcm\u00fcz \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span>Oryantalizmin en \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span>Said oryantalizmi \u00a0\u00a0 <\/span>\u201cKendimi modernite \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span>Burada hemen g\u00f6ze \u00a0<\/span>\u201cOrtado\u011fu k\u00fclt\u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fc Ali R\u0131zgar<\/p>\n K\u00fcrdistan Stratejik Ara\u015ft\u0131rmalar Merkezi<\/p>\n www.lekolin.org \u2013 www.lekolin.net \u2013 www.lekolin.info\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n \t<\/p>\n
\nd\u0131\u015f\u0131nda olana dair alg\u0131s\u0131n\u0131 analiz eden, belki de en sistematik ve kapsaml\u0131
\n\u00e7al\u0131\u015fma, yirminci y\u00fczy\u0131l\u0131n son \u00e7eyre\u011finde g\u00f6r\u00fcnd\u00fc. Edward W.Said,
\nOrientalism(1978) adl\u0131 bu eserinde kadim Do\u011fu-Bat\u0131 ili\u015fkisini yeniden ele
\nalmakta ama bu kez s\u00f6z konusu ili\u015fkinin tarihsel s\u00fcre\u00e7teki niteli\u011fini farkl\u0131
\nbir bak\u0131\u015f a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131 ve yepyeni bir teorik d\u00fczlem e\u015fli\u011finde tart\u0131\u015fmaktad\u0131r.\u00a0 <\/span>O zamana kadar entelekt\u00fcel arenada Do\u011fu-Bat\u0131
\nsorunsal\u0131 b\u00fcy\u00fck oranda Avrupa s\u00f6m\u00fcrgecili\u011fi, \u0131rk\u00e7\u0131l\u0131k ve emperyalizm gibi geni\u015f
\nve genel kavramlar alt\u0131nda, yak\u0131n d\u00f6nem tarihsel olaylar ve g\u00fcncel siyasi
\ngeli\u015fmelerle birlikte ele al\u0131n\u0131rken, 1978\u2019den sonra meselenin asl\u0131nda hi\u00e7 de
\ng\u00f6r\u00fcnd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc kadar basit olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ortaya \u00e7\u0131km\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Said, Bat\u0131\u2019n\u0131n mevcut siyasi,
\nekonomik ve k\u00fclt\u00fcrel tahakk\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fcn gerisinde \u00e7ok k\u00f6kl\u00fc ve karma\u015f\u0131k bir
\nmekanizman\u0131n i\u015fledi\u011fini fark etmi\u015f, bu mekanizman\u0131n alabildi\u011fine uzun bir zaman
\ndiliminde izini s\u00fcrerek, onun yap\u0131s\u0131n\u0131, i\u00e7eri\u011fini, d\u00fczenini ve sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131
\netkili bir \u00fcslupla g\u00f6zler \u00f6n\u00fcne sermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
\nFoucault\u2019dan ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 teorik zemin ba\u011flam\u0131nda, Bat\u0131\u2019n\u0131n, \u00f6tekisi olarak Do\u011fu
\ndenen bir \u00f6l\u00fc icat etti\u011fini, bunun hayali bir co\u011frafya, kurgusal bir tasar\u0131m ve
\ng\u00fc\u00e7-merkezli bir alg\u0131ya yasland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ortaya koymu\u015ftur. Foucault\u2019nun bilgi ve
\ng\u00fc\u00e7 aras\u0131ndaki ili\u015fkisi ve temsil kavram\u0131n\u0131, oryantalizme uygulayan Said, Do\u011fu
\nhakk\u0131ndaki her t\u00fcrl\u00fc bilginin, onu i\u015faretleyen, \u00e7evreleyen ve in\u015fa eden bir
\ns\u00f6ylemin (oryantalist s\u00f6ylem) nedeni ve sonucu oldu\u011funu ve son kertede Do\u011fu\u2019yu
\nBat\u0131l\u0131 g\u00fcc\u00fcn tahakk\u00fcm\u00fcne ve s\u00f6m\u00fcr\u00fcs\u00fcne a\u00e7ma y\u00f6n\u00fcnde hizmet g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ileri
\ns\u00fcrmektedir. Bunun i\u00e7in y\u00fczy\u0131llara yay\u0131lm\u0131\u015f metinsel devasa bir oryantalist
\nk\u00fclliyat birikmi\u015ftir. Do\u011fu hakk\u0131nda yazanlar, konu\u015fanlar, siyaset\u00e7iler,
\nseyyahlar vb. her biri oryantalist yap\u0131ya bir bi\u00e7imde eklemlenmi\u015f, onun ku\u015faklar
\naras\u0131 aktar\u0131m\u0131 ve ge\u00e7i\u015fkenli\u011finde kendilerine d\u00fc\u015fen rol\u00fc oynam\u0131\u015flard\u0131r. Bu
\nnedenle s\u00f6z konusu ili\u015fki, metinsel bir ili\u015fki oldu\u011fu i\u00e7in, oryantalizm de bir
\ns\u00f6ylem olarak kavramsalla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Said\u2019in deyimiyle, Do\u011fu ile ilgili
\nmetinler Do\u011fu\u2019yu yaratm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/p>\n
\nolarak tan\u0131mlaman\u0131n \u00f6tesinde onu, \u00f6zellikle Michel Foucault\u2019nun \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131n\u0131
\nkullanarak, s\u00f6ylem ve iktidar teorileriyle ili\u015fkilendirmeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131r. Bu ele
\nal\u0131\u015f bi\u00e7iminde oryantalizm bir tahakk\u00fcm s\u00f6ylemidir. Hem Avrupa\u2019n\u0131n Ortado\u011fu\u2019ya
\nboyun e\u011fdirmesinin bir \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fc, hem de bu s\u00fcre\u00e7te kullan\u0131lan bir vas\u0131tad\u0131r. Onu
\nolu\u015fturan fikirler \u2013boyun e\u011fdirilmi\u015f halklar\u0131n k\u00fclt\u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fc ve tarihini inkar eden
\nve onlar\u0131n bu egemenli\u011fine kar\u015f\u0131 meydana getirdikleri direni\u015f s\u00fcrecini
\ng\u00f6rmezlikten gelen- bu \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f noktas\u0131 ve ara\u00e7sall\u0131k yoluyla a\u00e7\u0131klanabilir.
\nOryantalizmi olu\u015fturan fikirler bu egemenlik ya da emperyalizm projesi i\u00e7in
\nkullan\u0131\u015fl\u0131d\u0131r.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/p>\n
\nmerkezlerinin Do\u011fu\u00a0 <\/span>(\u0130slam, \u00c7in ve Hind)
\nk\u00fclt\u00fcr ve medeniyetini tan\u0131mak i\u00e7in a\u00e7t\u0131klar\u0131 bir ilim ekol\u00fc olup, \u201cDo\u011fu
\nara\u015ft\u0131rmalar\u0131 anlam\u0131nda kullan\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. <\/p>\n
\nDo\u011fu, Avrupa\u2019n\u0131n bir icad\u0131 olup, eski \u00e7a\u011flardan beri insanlarda h\u00fclyalar uyand\u0131ran,
\ngarip izlenimler yaratan, kendine has yarat\u0131klar\u0131 ve manzaralar\u0131 ile fevkalade
\ndeneyimlere yol a\u00e7an bir yerdir. <\/p>\n
\nDo\u011fu, Uzak Do\u011fu\u2019dur. Ve \u00f6zellikle \u00c7in ve Japonya\u2019d\u0131r. Amerikal\u0131lar\u0131n aksine
\nFrans\u0131zlar ile \u0130ngilizler ve onlar kadar olmasa da Almanlar, Ruslar,
\n\u0130spanyollar, Portekizliler, \u0130talyanlar, \u0130sve\u00e7liler uzun bir oryantalizm
\ngelene\u011fine sahiptir.\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/p>\n
\ninsanlar san\u0131r. Ben ise her kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131mda, her Avrupal\u0131y\u0131 \u00e7ok toy ve Do\u011fu
\nk\u00fclt\u00fcr\u00fcnde ya\u015fayamayacak kadar narin, saf ve donan\u0131ms\u0131z sayar\u0131m. (A.\u00d6CALAN) <\/p>\n
\nyaz\u0131ya d\u00f6ken veya ara\u015ft\u0131ran kimseye \u015earkiyat\u00e7\u0131 ya da oryantalist denir. Yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131
\n\u015feyde oryantalizmdir.<\/p>\n
\nbiti\u015fik bir kara olman\u0131n yan\u0131nda, Avrupa\u2019n\u0131n en b\u00fcy\u00fck, en zengin ve en eski
\ns\u00f6m\u00fcrgelerinin bulundu\u011fu yerdir. Kurdu\u011fu medeniyetlerin ve konu\u015ftu\u011fu dilin
\nkayna\u011f\u0131 ve k\u00fclt\u00fcrel uzan\u0131m\u0131d\u0131r. En \u00f6nemlisi Do\u011fu, Avrupa\u2019n\u0131n \u2018kar\u015f\u0131t kalesi\u2019
\nolarak kendini tesisinin en b\u00fcy\u00fck yard\u0131mc\u0131s\u0131d\u0131r. Bu y\u00f6nleriyle Oryantalizm,
\nk\u00fclt\u00fcrel hatta ideolojik bir a\u00e7\u0131dan, arkas\u0131nda m\u00fcesseseler, kelimeler, ilim,
\ntasvirler, \u00f6\u011fretiler hatta m\u00fcstemleke (s\u00f6m\u00fcrge) b\u00fcrokrasileri, m\u00fcstemleke
\nusulleriyle kavramlar olan bir sorgulama bi\u00e7imidir.<\/p>\n
\nDo\u011fuculuk, ne de Bat\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k yapmakt\u0131r. Tarihsel toplumun b\u00fct\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc,
\nkesintisizli\u011fini ve s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fclme farkl\u0131l\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 birlik i\u00e7inde do\u011fru bir yoruma
\ntabi tutmak temel endi\u015femdir, emel ve \u00e7abamd\u0131r. <\/p>\n
\nsorgulama usul\u00fc olarak ele almaks\u0131z\u0131n ve Do\u011fu hakk\u0131nda s\u00f6z s\u00f6ylerken bu
\nsorgulaman\u0131n usullerine riayet etmeksizin ba\u015far\u0131l\u0131 olmak yani Do\u011fu\u2019yu politik,
\nsosyolojik, askeri, ideolojik, bilimsel ve fikri bak\u0131mdan y\u00f6netmek imk\u00e2n\u0131
\nyoktur. Yani Oryantalizm \u015eark s\u00f6z konusu oldu\u011funda otomatik olarak devreye
\ngiren ve tesir icra eden menfaatler \u00f6rg\u00fcs\u00fcd\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
\nmoderniteye kar\u015f\u0131 direni\u015f ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmemi\u015ftir. Ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilse bile
\nyutulmaktan, i\u00e7inde erimekten kurtulamam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu k\u0131yaslama bile k\u00fclt\u00fcrel
\nyap\u0131n\u0131n tarihsel ve toplumsal kal\u0131c\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kan\u0131tlamaya yeterlidir. (A.\u00d6CALAN –
\nDEMOKRAT\u0130K UYGARLIK MAN\u0130FESTOSU)\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/p>\n
\nAvrupa\u2019n\u0131n Do\u011fu hakk\u0131ndaki bir uydurmas\u0131 de\u011fil, Bat\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan bilin\u00e7li v\u00fccuda
\ngetirilmi\u015f ve nesiller boyu hat\u0131r\u0131 say\u0131l\u0131r yat\u0131r\u0131mlara konu olmu\u015f bir teori ve
\npratikler b\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcd\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
\nBalfour\u2019un ifadelerine g\u00f6re, M\u0131s\u0131r \u0130ngiltere\u2019nin bildi\u011fi nesnedir, \u0130ngiltere
\nM\u0131s\u0131r\u2019l\u0131lar\u0131n kendi kendini y\u00f6netemeyece\u011fini bilmektedir ve M\u0131s\u0131r\u2019\u0131 i\u015fgal
\nederek bunu teyit etmi\u015ftir. M\u0131s\u0131r medeniyeti \u0130ngiltere idaresine girmekle
\nm\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
\nBat\u0131\u2019l\u0131lar vard\u0131r, birde Do\u011fu\u2019lular vard\u0131r. Birinciler h\u00fckmederler, \u00f6tekiler
\nh\u00fck\u00fcm alt\u0131nda olmal\u0131d\u0131rlar, bu da ekseriye \u00fclkelerin i\u015fgal edilmesi, i\u00e7
\ni\u015flerine tam m\u00fcdahale, can ve mallar\u0131n\u0131 \u015fu ya da bu Bat\u0131l\u0131 g\u00fcc\u00fcn eline
\nb\u0131rakmas\u0131 demektir.<\/p>\n
\nbizzat bir Do\u011fu-Bat\u0131 senteziydi. Tabii ki o d\u00f6nem hakim k\u00fclt\u00fcrlerin senteziydi,
\nama yine de \u00f6nemliydi. Tarih bir daha o denli b\u00fcy\u00fck bir k\u00fclt\u00fcrler sentezine
\ntan\u0131k olmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Buna g\u00fcn\u00fcm\u00fczde dahildir. ( A.\u00d6CALAN)\u00a0 <\/span><\/p>\n
\noryantalistlere g\u00f6re Do\u011fu mant\u0131ks\u0131zd\u0131r, dinsiz olup azg\u0131nd\u0131r, \u00e7ocuk ruhludur,
\nsapk\u0131nd\u0131r. B\u00f6ylece Avrupal\u0131 makuld\u00fcr, faz\u0131ld\u0131r, olgun ve normaldir.<\/p>\n
\npozitif bir doktrinden ziyade d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnceye getirilmi\u015f baz\u0131 s\u0131n\u0131rlamalar olarak anla\u015f\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r.
\nO, entelekt\u00fcel bir kudretin ifadesidir.<\/p>\n
\noryantalist\u2019e g\u00f6re ger\u00e7ek insan Bat\u0131l\u0131d\u0131r. Do\u011fu nimetlerinin kullan\u0131m hakk\u0131 da
\n\u00f6ncelikle bu ger\u00e7ek insana aittir. Onun g\u00f6z\u00fcnde Do\u011fu\u2019lu: deve \u00fcst\u00fcnde, eli
\nkamal\u0131, ukala, her t\u00fcrl\u00fc ahlaks\u0131zl\u0131\u011fa e\u011filimli, \u015fehvet d\u00fc\u015fk\u00fcn\u00fc bir insand\u0131r.<\/p>\n
\nOrtado\u011fu\u2019sunda Avrupa modernitesini ele\u015ftirmek, hatta radikal \u0130slamla \u015fiddete
\ndayal\u0131 olarak kar\u015f\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kmak moda olmu\u015ftur. (A.\u00d6CALAN DEMOKRAT\u0130K UYGARLIK) <\/p>\n
\nb\u00fcy\u00fck hatas\u0131 ba\u015fka bir k\u00fclt\u00fcr\u00fc, milleti ya da co\u011frafi b\u00f6lgeyi \u00f6nemsememesi ve
\nona zaaf\u0131ndan ayr\u0131lmayan, de\u011fi\u015fmeyecek kusurlar atfetmesidir.\u00a0 <\/span><\/p>\n
\ntam olarak tan\u0131mlamaz, daha ziyade farkl\u0131 ve her zaman birbirleriyle uyumlu
\nolmayan \u00e7e\u015fitli bak\u0131\u015f a\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131ndan nitelendirir ve i\u015faret eder. Oryantalizmin \u00fc\u00e7
\ntan\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 yaparak, analizlerinin omurgas\u0131n\u0131 olu\u015fturan tarihsel genellemelere
\ngiri\u015fir. Bu tan\u0131mlardan birincisi, oryantalizm oryantalistlerin yapt\u0131klar\u0131 ve
\nyapmakta olduklar\u0131 \u015feydir. Bir oryantalist \u2018Do\u011fu\u2019yu \u00f6zg\u00fcl ya da genel
\ny\u00f6nleriyle \u00f6\u011freten, hakk\u0131nda yazan ya da ara\u015ft\u0131ran kimseye\u2019 denir. Bu grubun
\ni\u00e7erisine akademisyenler ve h\u00fck\u00fcmet uzmanlar\u0131 girer: filologlar, sosyologlar,
\ntarih\u00e7iler ve antropologlar. \u0130kincisi, oryantalizm \u2018 Do\u011fu ile Bat\u0131\u00a0 <\/span>aras\u0131nda yap\u0131lan ontolojik ve epistemolojik
\nbir ayr\u0131ma dayal\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnme tarz\u0131d\u0131r\u2019. Do\u011fu ile Bat\u0131 aras\u0131ndaki temel bir ikili
\nkar\u015f\u0131tl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ifade eder. Son olarak, oryantalizm \u2018 Do\u011fu\u2019yla u\u011fra\u015fan ortak bir
\nkurumdur\u2019 ve bu kabaca on sekizinci y\u00fczy\u0131l\u0131n sonlar\u0131n\u0131 takiben gelen s\u00f6m\u00fcrge
\n\u00e7a\u011f\u0131nda \u2018Do\u011fu\u2019ya egemen olan, Do\u011fu\u2019yu yeniden yap\u0131land\u0131ran ve onun \u00fczerinde
\notorite kuran\u2019 g\u00fcc\u00fc elinde bulundurur. Bu \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc tan\u0131m di\u011fer ikisinin aksine
\ns\u0131k\u0131 bir birey \u00f6tesi, k\u00fclt\u00fcrel d\u00fczeyde olu\u015fturulmu\u015f ve Do\u011fu hakk\u0131nda
\ns\u00f6ylenebilecek ya da yaz\u0131labilecek her \u015feyi \u00f6rg\u00fctleyebilecek ve b\u00fcy\u00fck oranda
\nbelirleyebilecek \u2018 muazzam d\u00fczeyde sistematik\u2019 bir mekanizma sunmaktad\u0131r. <\/p>\n
\nkar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda g\u00f6zlemlerken, b\u00fcy\u00fck \u00e7eli\u015fkiler i\u00e7inde kald\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131 fark ediyorum. Bunun
\niki nedeni vard\u0131r: birincisi, klasik Ortado\u011fu k\u00fclt\u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn etkisidir. Bu k\u00fclt\u00fcr\u00fcn
\nkapitalist moderniteyle k\u00f6kl\u00fc \u00e7eli\u015fkileri vard\u0131r. Her \u015feyden \u00f6nce bu k\u00fclt\u00fcr
\ntopluma \u00f6ncelik vermede \u00e7ok radikaldir. Bireycilik toplumda kolay kolay y\u00fcz
\nbulamaz toplumsal ba\u011fl\u0131l\u0131k ki\u015filik de\u011ferlendirmesinde temel bir \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fctt\u00fcr.
\nToplumlar\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131l\u0131k hepten y\u00fcceltilmi\u015ftir. Bunda din ve gelene\u011fin etkisi
\ng\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fcd\u00fcr. Ortado\u011fu\u2019nun geleneksel hiyerar\u015fik ve devlet k\u00fclt\u00fcr\u00fc bu alg\u0131lamada da
\n\u00e7ok etkilidir. Bu \u00f6zelliklerin toplam etkisi nedeniyle d\u0131\u015f k\u00fclt\u00fcrlere, bu arada
\nmodern k\u00fclt\u00fcr\u00fc kolay teslim olmaz. Daha do\u011frusu i\u00e7inde zor asimile olur. (
\nA.\u00d6CALAN – DEMOKRAT\u0130K UYGARLIK MAN\u0130FESTOSU) <\/p>\n
\n\u00e7arpan bir nokta, Said\u2019in \u2018 tan\u0131mlar\u0131\u2019n\u0131n birincisinde ve \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fcs\u00fcnde
\noryantalizmin, Do\u011fu diye adland\u0131r\u0131lan bir \u015feyle ili\u015fkilendirilirken ikincisinde
\nDo\u011fu\u2019nun salt sorgulanabilir bir zihinsel i\u015flemin \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fc olarak var olmas\u0131d\u0131r.
\nSaid s\u0131k s\u0131k bir metnin ya da gelene\u011fin Do\u011fu\u2019nun ger\u00e7ek ya da sahici bir
\n\u00f6zelli\u011fini \u00e7arp\u0131tt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, tahakk\u00fcm alt\u0131na ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ya da g\u00f6rmezden geldi\u011fini
\ns\u00f6yler. Fakat ba\u015fka bir yerde \u2018ger\u00e7ek bir Do\u011fu\u2019nun varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 yads\u0131r ve bu
\nhususta Foucault\u2019a ve zikretti\u011fi di\u011fer radikal temsil ele\u015ftirmenlerine daha
\ns\u0131k\u0131 bir ba\u011fl\u0131l\u0131k sergiler. Hatta \u2018Do\u011fu\u2019da yer alan k\u00fclt\u00fcrlerin ve uluslar\u0131n\u2026
\nbunlar\u0131n ya\u015famlar\u0131n\u0131n, tarihlerinin ve geleneklerinin ham ger\u00e7ekli\u011fi\u2019ne k\u0131sa
\nbir at\u0131f yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda bir \u015feyin olmamas\u0131, kendi cephesinden anlaml\u0131 bir
\ny\u00f6ntem tercihini ifade etmektedir. Oryantalist gayr-\u0131 sahicili\u011fe bir
\nsahicilikle kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k verilmez. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla Said neredeyse totolojik ifadelere
\n(\u00f6rne\u011fin s\u0131k s\u0131k dile getirdi\u011fi, oryantalist s\u00f6ylemin \u2018Do\u011fu\u2019yu do\u011fula\u015ft\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131\u2019
\nyorumu) ya da yarars\u0131z saptamalara\u00a0
\n<\/span>(\u00f6rne\u011fin, \u2018oryantalizm g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcrde Do\u011fu\u2019ya uygun mecburiyetlerin, bak\u0131\u015f
\na\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n, ideolojik e\u011filimlerin egemen oldu\u011fu d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f ( ya da
\nDo\u011fulula\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f) bir yaz\u0131m, bir g\u00f6r\u00fc ve inceleme tarz\u0131 olarak g\u00f6r\u00fclebilir\u2019)
\nba\u015fvurmak zorunda kal\u0131r. <\/p>\n
\nkapitalizme kar\u015f\u0131 savunmak gerekir. \u015e\u00fcphesiz bat\u0131 oryantalizmini a\u015fmadan
\nba\u015far\u0131lacak bir g\u00f6rev de\u011fildir bu. Yeniden \u0130slamc\u0131l\u0131k ise, tepeden t\u0131rna\u011fa
\nkadar en kof oryantalizm t\u00fcrevidir.\u00a0
\n<\/span>Kapitalizmin zafer mek\u00e2n\u0131 kuzey bat\u0131 Avrupa\u2019n\u0131n sahilleri ve \u0130ngiltere
\nadas\u0131d\u0131r. Kapitalizm zafer y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fc d\u00f6rt y\u00fcz y\u0131ld\u0131r d\u00fcnya-sistem seviyesinde
\ns\u00fcrd\u00fcrmektedir. T\u00f6kezledi\u011fi yer Ortado\u011fu kadim k\u00fclt\u00fcr merkezleridir. Asl\u0131nda
\nkapitalizmin kendisi bu k\u00fclt\u00fcr\u00fcn en son ink\u00e2rc\u0131, hay\u0131rs\u0131z evlad\u0131 konumundad\u0131r.
\nAralar\u0131ndaki \u00e7at\u0131\u015fma san\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan daha fazla derindir. \u015euan ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen,
\nacemiler sava\u015f\u0131d\u0131r. Adeta \u0130skender\u2019le \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc Darius\u2019un kopyalar\u0131 oynanmaktad\u0131r.
\nG.W. Bush ne kadar \u0130skender ise, Ahmedi Necad da o denli Darius\u2019tur. Diyalektik
\n\u00e7eli\u015fki \u00e7ok derinlerde ve \u00e7ok bi\u00e7imlik alt\u0131nda cereyan etmektedir. \u00c7eli\u015fki
\nsadece egemen klikler aras\u0131nda dile gelmemektedir. Tolumun iktidar kar\u015f\u0131tl\u0131\u011f\u0131
\nda kapsaml\u0131ca devreye girmi\u015f durumdad\u0131r. (A.\u00d6CALAN)\u00a0 <\/span><\/p>\n